Star Wars CCG Players Committee Forums

Sorry for the super long wait. We have clarified Laser Gate to be targetable as a character. If a weapon has some effect other than causing the target to be hit or lost, apply that effect if possible, otherwise it is simply ignored (e.g. making it power = 0 with Amidala's Blaster or trying to captur...

Update bump. I just added a note in the Using Devices entry that explicitly notes that employing automatic modifiers are not considered using a device.

Ruling here: /viewt ... 73#p932673

I have a few new errata and rulings to post. They are effective immediately. Removed text is in strikethrough. New text is underlined. Firstly, it was brought to our attention recently that the new Senate defensive shields (Vote of No Confidence and The Republic No Longer Functions) had an unintende...

Yes. The cost is free, but it is a regular move. This is described in the very first entry on 7-3. Regular - Starship And Vehicle Sites You may move your cards to or from your starship or vehicle card (or its location) and a related starship/vehicle site for free. You may perform any of the followin...

I recently posted a clarification for Magnetic Suction Tube that allows it to only "suck up" characters to the sites on that particular sandcrawler, and not any others on the same planet.

The ruling can be found here: /viewt ... 10#p930210

I recently posted a few rulings/errata that should deal with the issues brought up in this thread. Covert Landing should now work as intended with the Luminous and with landed shuttles.

The ruling can be found here: /viewt ... 10#p930210

Update: this was clarified in the recent current rulings thread update. As Aglets said, it has been changed to explicitly "retrieve 1 force".

I just wanted to update this. As alluded to by Aglets, in addition to the ruling on reacting costs that he posted, Jabba's text was fixed with a recently announced errata. It can be found in the current rulings thread here: /viewt ... 10#p930210

The following rulings and errata are effective immediately. Removed text is in strikethrough; added text is underlined. Appendix A - Errata Jabba The Hutt Deploy -2 at Tatooine or Nal Hutta. To move use his landspeed requires +2 Force. May escort a captive. While at Audience Chamber, adds 1 to forfe...

yes, it falls under the one rule. It specifies a time frame - "your deploy phase" and a singular action - "deploy A matching weapon".

Uggla was actually very good in his years with the marlins. He played average to a bit below avg defense at 2b with OPS'es consistently over 800. Then his bat fell off a cliff. I definitely wouldn't give him 1 mil now, maybe a minor league deal is ok, but he was good at one point.

Looks like we lost this one somehow, sorry for making you wait. There was a bit of discussion on this, and the rules team determined that the line in the entry quoted by Gergall above (that allows for 'just' responses before the character goes undercover) is in addition to any automatic actions that...

Nothing stops you from deploying a utinni effect to the same location as its target, unless the card itself prevents it. In the Lat Damage example, it would be immediately reached as soon its deployment resolves. Likewise with The Emperor's Prize.

I should be able to make it to this. I may or may not have new decks.

I'm not sure how much I even want to play this game any more. The game already had too much RNG. Whatever designers at blizzard that thought it was a good idea to make an expansion almost entirely dedicated to RNG need to be fired. Yeah the meta was stale and pretty predicable, but Blizzard seems to...

Here is a video of Brady in action: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmOvgwhbMW4

I finally had a 12 win arena. It might be the most solid deck I've ever seen in the format. Not really any bombs (except maybe sword of justice), but great card quality from top to bottom. I was the beneficiary of some really good mad bomber RNG and only played 1 or 2 mages; that certainly helped. b...

Oops, this was in the last current ruling post, but I didn't bump the thread when I posted it. Ruling is here: /styles/subsilver2/imageset/icon_post_target.gif Here is the relevant part: The following is an addendum to the Attacks - Parasites Attacking entry on page 6-10: Attacks - Parasites Attacki...

Can Luke Skywalker v on Red 5 move from the Yavin 4 system to the Death Star system and initiate an attack run on the same turn? or do they have to wait until next turn? Moving into the trench is a regular move for the Light Side, even though it is free, so Red V would not be able to move to the De...

We have clarified the Leaves Table rule so that it is clear that each player gets to choose the order to place their own cards in lost pile when multiple cards are lost simultaneously.

The ruling can be found here: /viewt ... 23#p919523