Why aren't these in the tweak set?

SWCCG game play discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
Emkay09
Member
Posts: 407
Joined: September 26th, 2011, 4:01 pm
Location: Dortmund, Germany

Why aren't these in the tweak set?

Post by Emkay09 »

Spoiler
Show
After looking to the Current Rulings thread I found, that these errata's has been made:

First, some things from the CBT / DnD / Proofing

The following are all new entries to Appendix A of the AR and are effective immediately.

Ambush (V)
This card should have the [Episode I] icon.

Make Ten Men Feel Like A Hundred
If Stardust on table, deploy on table. Saw is a Resistance Agent and spy. Once per game, may \/ Saw. Rebel spies deploy -1 to Scarif. Once per battle, if you just drew a Rebel spy for destiny, may retrieve 1 Force. Nightfall is canceled. [Immune to Alter.]

Xizor's Palace: Sewer
DARK: Once per game, may exchange an alien in hand with a non-spy Black Sun agent in Lost Pile.
LIGHT: Once per game, if you control, may retrieve a Corellian.
I am now wondering. Why aren't these parts of Set 12 and the pdf?

But maybe I am blind and there IS a pdf of these changes. On the main paige there wasn't.


Moritz Karge
-
Ralltiir Regionals 2015 runner-up
Ralltiir Regionals 2017 runner-up

arebelspy
Member
Posts: 16192
Joined: July 14th, 2005, 4:45 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: Why aren't these in the tweak set?

Post by arebelspy »

They are put in their original sets they were released in, as they were errata. So like han's blaster is still in v0.

If you want to just print the new stuff, vkit has been updated with all the v12 new cards and changes.

User avatar
quickdraw3457
Multimedia and Special Projects Advocate
Posts: 25780
Joined: September 3rd, 2003, 5:10 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
GEMP Username: quickdraw

Re: Why aren't these in the tweak set?

Post by quickdraw3457 »

Actually the 3 cards in the OP were done separate from the tweak set. These were competitive balance errata from D&D/Advocates (with the exception of Ambush, which was just a minor proofing change essentially). We actually didn't agree to the changes to be made to them until a few weeks ago, after the Tweak Set was pretty close to being wrapped up.

One way to look at it is that the Tweak Set was intended to help previously unplayed cards, while these other errata (with the exception of Ambush) were done to tone them down a bit.
Matt C. - Pittsburgh, PA
Image
Hunter wrote:quickdraw is right

User avatar
Emkay09
Member
Posts: 407
Joined: September 26th, 2011, 4:01 pm
Location: Dortmund, Germany

Re: Why aren't these in the tweak set?

Post by Emkay09 »

arebelspy wrote:
March 23rd, 2020, 5:21 pm
They are put in their original sets they were released in, as they were errata. So like han's blaster is still in v0.
Yeah, but Han's blaster was on the Set 12 pdf.

arebelspy wrote:
March 23rd, 2020, 5:21 pm
If you want to just print the new stuff, vkit has been updated with all the v12 new cards and changes.
Thank you.
Moritz Karge
-
Ralltiir Regionals 2015 runner-up
Ralltiir Regionals 2017 runner-up

User avatar
Emkay09
Member
Posts: 407
Joined: September 26th, 2011, 4:01 pm
Location: Dortmund, Germany

Re: Why aren't these in the tweak set?

Post by Emkay09 »

quickdraw3457 wrote:
March 23rd, 2020, 5:25 pm
Actually the 3 cards in the OP were done separate from the tweak set. These were competitive balance errata from D&D/Advocates (with the exception of Ambush, which was just a minor proofing change essentially). We actually didn't agree to the changes to be made to them until a few weeks ago, after the Tweak Set was pretty close to being wrapped up.

One way to look at it is that the Tweak Set was intended to help previously unplayed cards, while these other errata (with the exception of Ambush) were done to tone them down a bit.
Thanks for the clarification. I'll hope for the pdf release soon. Because they are not in vkit.
Moritz Karge
-
Ralltiir Regionals 2015 runner-up
Ralltiir Regionals 2017 runner-up

User avatar
quickdraw3457
Multimedia and Special Projects Advocate
Posts: 25780
Joined: September 3rd, 2003, 5:10 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
GEMP Username: quickdraw

Re: Why aren't these in the tweak set?

Post by quickdraw3457 »

Emkay09 wrote:
March 23rd, 2020, 5:47 pm
quickdraw3457 wrote:
March 23rd, 2020, 5:25 pm
Actually the 3 cards in the OP were done separate from the tweak set. These were competitive balance errata from D&D/Advocates (with the exception of Ambush, which was just a minor proofing change essentially). We actually didn't agree to the changes to be made to them until a few weeks ago, after the Tweak Set was pretty close to being wrapped up.

One way to look at it is that the Tweak Set was intended to help previously unplayed cards, while these other errata (with the exception of Ambush) were done to tone them down a bit.
Thanks for the clarification. I'll hope for the pdf release soon. Because they are not in vkit.
Yeah, the PDFs are being finished up and should be available shortly.
Matt C. - Pittsburgh, PA
Image
Hunter wrote:quickdraw is right

Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”