LadyLuck/Slave I are bad for the game

macgyver221
LS Region: Dagobah
LS Region: Dagobah
Posts: 6589
Joined: June 7th, 2006, 10:36 pm
Location: Reno
Holotable username: Macgyver221
GEMP Username: macgyver1

Re: LadyLuck/Slave I are bad for the game

Post by macgyver221 »

Assuming the guy wasn't pullable (as state above), I think this could be a much more reasonable way of doing things (in small doses). Kinda like a better version of the chewie that pulls the falcon.



User avatar
hyvee_doughboy
Member
Posts: 1678
Joined: September 13th, 2008, 8:44 pm
Location: Maple Grove, MN

Re: LadyLuck/Slave I are bad for the game

Post by hyvee_doughboy »

Interestingly, we already had this (ship pulling a guy) in Blockade Flagship + Daultay V. Ive only seen this splashed in a few decks outside of Invasion. Have others seen that used outside of Invasion?

I do like the idea though. Im actually not really sure why that was never very popular. Maybe bc they arent imperials or alien/independant, and that means they dont splash as easily?
Tom M. - Maple Grove, Minnesota

Grathrax
Reflections Pack
Reflections Pack
Posts: 156
Joined: June 12th, 2004, 12:17 am
Location: VA
Contact:

Re: LadyLuck/Slave I are bad for the game

Post by Grathrax »

hyvee_doughboy wrote:Interestingly, we already had this (ship pulling a guy) in Blockade Flagship + Daultay V. Ive only seen this splashed in a few decks outside of Invasion. Have others seen that used outside of Invasion?
That's a capital ship, and doesn't have squassins. Super slave I and Lady Luck do, which is why they are different from the Blockade Flagship.

User avatar
stephengascrub
Member
Posts: 1464
Joined: April 15th, 2011, 11:17 pm
Location: Georgia
GEMP Username: Polymers55

Re: LadyLuck/Slave I are bad for the game

Post by stephengascrub »

I don't feel reading through this thread. All I'm going to say is I agree that Lady Luck and Slave I (as designed) are bad. Characters/Ships that good should not be able to pull each other.
Stephen M.
Dagobah Region

Image

Image



-Team The Bad Batch

User avatar
stevetotheizz0
Member
Posts: 5599
Joined: January 10th, 2012, 11:43 am
Location: Philadelphia, Pa

Re: LadyLuck/Slave I are bad for the game

Post by stevetotheizz0 »

I think Macgyver has had more than enough opportunity to voice his opinion in this whole process already.

Can we ban him from posting in any further threads with his opinions in addition to the other actions already taken?

Hayes
LS Region: Kashyyyk
LS Region: Kashyyyk
Posts: 4735
Joined: February 22nd, 2009, 1:58 am

Re: LadyLuck/Slave I are bad for the game

Post by Hayes »

stevetotheizz0 wrote:I think Macgyver has had more than enough opportunity to voice his opinion in this whole process already.

Can we ban him from posting in any further threads with his opinions in addition to the other actions already taken?
This is the most ignorant thing you've ever posted.

User avatar
dorshe1
Member
Posts: 8422
Joined: June 13th, 2013, 3:57 pm
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Holotable username: dorshe1
GEMP Username: dorshe1
Contact:

Re: LadyLuck/Slave I are bad for the game

Post by dorshe1 »

Hayes wrote:
stevetotheizz0 wrote:I think Macgyver has had more than enough opportunity to voice his opinion in this whole process already.

Can we ban him from posting in any further threads with his opinions in addition to the other actions already taken?
This is the most ignorant thing you've ever posted.
Isn't that a challenge to just prove you wrong?

Thanks!
Image

Post Reply

Return to “On Deck Discussion”